I don't require 'no existence' the logic does. I believe in God. Not knowing he exists necessitates faith.
Why I believe is due to the promises of believing.. the positive effect of that. We all struggle to work out a world view that aims at living life as perfectly as possible. To me Christianity is the manual to that. I'm the sort that reads the manual last usually. I work stuff out for myself. I guess it's pretty true for this as well, I worked it out and found this to be right.
I asked you what proof would make you accept that there was a God, and you could think of none. That is because there can be none. Nothing would satisfy us that God existed, because that would be an impossibility, given the criteria that being would have to fulfill.
So it's not only logical to not require evidence, it's naturally impossible. If it is impossible to formulate a requirement of proof for you, how can you say it's illogical to believe without proof?? Proof obviously has no place here.
Why I believe is due to the promises of believing.. the positive effect of that. We all struggle to work out a world view that aims at living life as perfectly as possible. To me Christianity is the manual to that. I'm the sort that reads the manual last usually. I work stuff out for myself. I guess it's pretty true for this as well, I worked it out and found this to be right.
I asked you what proof would make you accept that there was a God, and you could think of none. That is because there can be none. Nothing would satisfy us that God existed, because that would be an impossibility, given the criteria that being would have to fulfill.
So it's not only logical to not require evidence, it's naturally impossible. If it is impossible to formulate a requirement of proof for you, how can you say it's illogical to believe without proof?? Proof obviously has no place here.
