RE: Origin of Articles
June 24, 2012 at 9:19 pm
(This post was last modified: June 24, 2012 at 9:21 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(June 24, 2012 at 7:57 pm)elunico13 Wrote: A person's reasoning isn't always correct. How do you determine then when your reasoning is accurate. Maybe, by using my reason.
The whole thing begs the very question. Why???
Same way science is self-correcting. When inconsistencies are detected or new facts are introduced. opinions can be changed to suit the new findings. For example, I reason that believers in Yahweh-Jesus have not met their burden of proof that this deity exists. What can you offer me to convince me otherwise?
(June 24, 2012 at 8:03 pm)elunico13 Wrote: You have left out all of the pre-conditions of intelligibilty.
Elaborate please?
Quote:Remember though I am the only one who has given a rational and logical justification for laws of logic.
As we've patiently explained to you, "GodDidIt" does not explain anything.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
