RE: Whether or not things exist
June 26, 2012 at 3:32 am
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2012 at 3:38 am by Light of Truth.)
It's intriguing to me that I never said what he can and cannot post. I merely said that I am the one who created the thread and therefore am justified in determining if a response is rude or not. Not once did I say he cannot post. I merely called him out for posting in a thread that asked for philosopher references without even referencing a philosopher, but instead attacking that which I was interested about. To me, that is indeed rude.
To use your term for myself (a solipsist), why would I care whether or not my own mental projection (Creed of Heresy) is rude? That would indeed be a good question.
To those who actually referenced philosophers, I have ordered both of the Russel texts that y'all recommended and I eagerly await their arrival!
To use your term for myself (a solipsist), why would I care whether or not my own mental projection (Creed of Heresy) is rude? That would indeed be a good question.
To those who actually referenced philosophers, I have ordered both of the Russel texts that y'all recommended and I eagerly await their arrival!
"God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8).
"Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter 3:15).
"Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter 3:15).
