RE: Nicholas Roerich (for the love of God)
July 6, 2012 at 4:18 pm
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 4:51 pm by Ionovaryeh.)
(July 6, 2012 at 8:46 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: This "god" does not present any evidence for it's existence....
Sorry ...EPIC FAIL....what's your name again??# 75
"Epic fail"? How old are you? I like that. And if you want to get so personal as knowing my name, what have you been through or seen that beseeches you to negate the idea of the existence of a higher spiritual /quantum entity against the fact that 90% of the world's population consists in some form of religion or spiritualism? In any case, do you understand anything about the nature of the spiritual realm? Or the existence of occult, and/or satanist groups that permeate world governments (otherwise known as Masons and Freemasons (as was George Washington))? Do you understand anything about voodoo, magick, or alchemy? What DO you understand, my "athiest" peer?
(July 6, 2012 at 2:16 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: On the assumption you aren't yet another shit and runner to grace the board, Ionovaryeh, three questions.
1. Why are you deliberately misspelling atheism?
2. Why are you redefining atheism as "non-theism" which is technically the same thing?
3. Why are you conflating theism with atheism?
Three pointless questions...that could have gone better unasked. Could not be farther from the original intent of this post (or future posts). The information that you are focusing on is miniscule. As for mispelling, I'm sorry..really.
