IF you compare WLC with say Ray Comfort or Ken Ham ( the bloke with a face like a peeled penis),the man is intellectual giant. However, if you compare him with a real scholar, such as say Richard Dawkins ( Phd Oxford) WLC is a village idiot,just like most of the apologist we have on this forum.
His claim to fame:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lane_Craig
IF the premise is true (which is actually arguable) the conclusion does not infer God. We are left with "what caused God?". The claim "God is the exception" is a logical fallacy called 'special pleading' which abrogates the premise.
Oh,Craig is also a member of "The Discovery Institute" ,which says all that is necessary to say about the depth of his scholastic rigour.
His claim to fame:
Quote:Craig's primary contribution to philosophy of religion is his revival of the Kalām cosmological argument. In The Kalām Cosmological Argument, he formulates the argument in the following manner:
Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence.
The universe began to exist.
Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lane_Craig
IF the premise is true (which is actually arguable) the conclusion does not infer God. We are left with "what caused God?". The claim "God is the exception" is a logical fallacy called 'special pleading' which abrogates the premise.
Oh,Craig is also a member of "The Discovery Institute" ,which says all that is necessary to say about the depth of his scholastic rigour.
