RE: Atheism
September 6, 2009 at 5:16 pm
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2009 at 5:18 pm by fr0d0.)
Thanks for your answer Kyu. For your kindness, and for your honesty.
Of course none of those things would ever constitute evidence for God. Anything evidential has then to be included in 'natural'/ as obeying the physical nature of the Universe.
Here's the answer you're looking for:
So your assumption that God doesn't exist because he fails to show his face is entirely erroneous.
Of course none of those things would ever constitute evidence for God. Anything evidential has then to be included in 'natural'/ as obeying the physical nature of the Universe.
Here's the answer you're looking for:
(September 6, 2009 at 4:46 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: I have no real idea
So your assumption that God doesn't exist because he fails to show his face is entirely erroneous.
(September 6, 2009 at 4:56 pm)Saerules Wrote: but nothing would ever give me evidence for "God", because it cannot exist.That's a very absolute statement Saerules. How do you know it cannot exist? Where is your proof for such a statement?