(July 14, 2012 at 4:48 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(July 14, 2012 at 4:42 pm)spockrates Wrote: In what way have I been dishonest?
Shifting the burden of proof, you take your god as logical by default, and claiming other people to provide explanations of why shouldn't we believe. It was a nice rehash try of that old chestnut, hence dihonest by its nature of being a plain petitio principii.
Not sure I understand, yet. How would you word my opening post if you were me? What question would be more sincere than the one I posed?
"If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains (no matter how improbable) must be the truth."
--Spock
--Spock