(July 15, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:(July 15, 2012 at 1:35 pm)spockrates Wrote: I suppose you might be correct, but my error is unintentional.
I am not convinced of this. The reason why in 3...2...1..
Quote:Please explain how trust in a person is unlike trust in a method.
I already explained that you are concealing the approach to each. Obfuscation isn't going to work for you, either.
Quote:I'm defining illogical as presenting an argument in which the premises do not support the conclusion.
Precisely what I was talking about.
Did you claim to be familiar with formal logic? You keep using all these terms from formal logic, and yet you do not use the proper term for this?
Familiar? Yes. Efficient? I suppose not. Please explain how I'm falling short.
"If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains (no matter how improbable) must be the truth."
--Spock
--Spock