(July 15, 2012 at 5:02 pm)ElDinero Wrote: Oh ok, so one was disproved completely.
The other one, the guy was just under 9 feet, still shorter than Goliath and Og by some way, and was a one in a billion extremity, not part of a population. Despite the fact that we have lots of bones of humans and human ancestors from throughout time, and despite the fact that there were apparently a population of these giants in Biblical times, there's no evidence for them.
Where does that put you?
Seriously? How long is a cubit exactly? Your forearm or mine? how long is a span your hand or mine? 9ft tall is is pretty darn close. That makes Golith's height plausable. which is what your Opening post was all about the implausablity of 'giants.' Now you are trying to save face and you seek for 'proof' to put Gaints in that time frame, which is a fools errand. For even if i provided proof you would want confirmation of the DNA to prove him to be Golith, and if by some mirical we could produce that you'd go the other way and want David's DNA, and then want 'proof' that He was killed with a sling shot, then you'd want to see the rock and the skull to match balastics...
Your orginal assertion was proven wrong because you did not even do a simple google search. Take your lumps and move on. Your only going to make this worse if you can't let things go.
