Atheism

[fr0d0]

As usual you didn't apply any thought before writing that CP. You batted people about the head with Christianity and now you do the same with atheism. Go read what we're talking about and then get back with an opinion if you must.

Not even worth a reply as usual you do what you do best, avoid the issues altogether.Debating a die hard christian who tenaciously clings to his faith based on ignorance is as fruitful as talking to a wall and expecting a response.

First you have to actually address the point chatpilot to engage someone. I see you dodge that basic challenge.. then accuse me of dodging a completely irrelevant question. Well done. Now get out of my face.

---

You're not reading what I put Kyu.

I want one example of a proof - one tangible, real example - not a type of example.

I suggest you cannot give me one because it is impossible to do so. Hence your requirement is completely irrational.

I would also point out that this assertion, on which your basing your entire argument that; because there is no evidence does not mean God does not exist. Is a complete fallacy, it essentially reads;

If YOU (Kyu/Sam/Any Other Person) are unable to provide one example of a proof that you would accept of God'd existence then, such a proof does not exist therefore I am right - haha

I trust I don't need to go into any further explanation of the problem with this?

Sam

You are correct. Just as you, with the dismissal of God have to leave the possibility that you could be wrong, I have to leave open the possibility that I may be wrong in asserting that there can be no acceptable evidence.

If you claim lack of evidence as your reason for disbelief, you have equally to the small possibility of evidence for God, the small possibility of there actually being any acceptable evidence. I don't see how you could make such a claim without having any idea what evidence would be acceptable. Therefore the claim is nullified.