RE: New Verb: Britebarting
July 26, 2012 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2012 at 7:16 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(July 26, 2012 at 4:44 pm)apophenia Wrote:
The gentleman's name was Andrew Breitbart, not Britebart. (And yes, I use the term gentleman exceedingly loosely. When I saw the misspelling, I vainly hoped it was some humorous piece about calling atheists 'Brites'. Sadly, it was not.)
Fixed. Thank God or the other admins that I'm a moderator.
(July 26, 2012 at 6:24 pm)CliveStaples Wrote:(July 26, 2012 at 6:03 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Teabagging was taken well before the "teabaggers" even came along.
Well, they were only called "teabaggers" by their opponents who were deriding them. They didn't claim the name for themselves--and they're only called that now by their opponents. It's not a commonly-accepted name, it's an insult--like "moonbat", or "wingnut".
Actually, not true. They didn't realize the meaning of the word but they did originally choose that name for themselves, much to their embarrassment.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
