(August 3, 2012 at 3:44 am)FallentoReason Wrote: So, ultimately, I believe the evidence is true without ever being able to know if it's true?
Well, I don't know about that. I'm not making that claim.
I'm saying that when you're trying to be an evidentialist, what you're really basing your beliefs on is your beliefs about evidence, not necessarily on the evidence itself.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
