Do your beliefs imply a Necessary being exists?

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

to find Clive tiresome and as biased as a soccer mom.

Not to mention as shrill.


A graphic example of the futility of trying to have a rational discussion with a presuppositional apologist.

I gave up when he ignorantly or dishonestly conflated mathematical proof with empirical proof.

I am also singularly unimpressed with his practice of slinging around modal logic (which he does not seem to have quiet grasped). A specialised field of study which is not broadly understood . In this context it's a form of obfuscation.

Here in Australia,we have a technical term, for such an approach; "baffling with bullshit "


My impression is of a first year undergraduate on an ego trip trying to show he knows a lot more than is actually the case. Or simply an adult whose expensive education didn't stick. Of course I may be wrong.


Yeah,I find him tedious too.