(August 12, 2012 at 2:52 pm)catfish Wrote: You still don't "get" my point.
And I guess this is the whiny maladjusted teenager "you don't understand me" tactic.
My response at this point is typically, "do tell or go sulk in your room".
Quote:If you can't argue without a logical fallacy, you shouldn't argue...
If you can't explain how and where a logical fallacy was used by your opponent, you shouldn't accuse your opponent of using a logical fallacy.
I'm suddenly having flashbacks to my exchange with Ryft, where he accused me of "begging the question" but could never articulate how despite repeated requests from me. Rather than answer the question directly and coherently, he finally broke down with the same *sigh*-why-am-I-so-cursed-to-try-to-debate-with-idiots-like-you drama.
Just a word of advice that I gave him, putting on a pompous demeanor will not make you look intelligent.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
