RE: The GOP and Guns
August 31, 2012 at 9:23 am
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2012 at 9:27 am by neilmarr.)
That's a relief, Frankie. Thanks for the clarification. I was sure it was on the statute books, but I confess I didn't check before publishing and be-damning myself. I'm pretty certain than Berwick, which declared war on Germany separately in 1914, officially ended the WWI conflict very recently, though ... at least -- my excuse being a twenty-seven-year absence from the UK -- I think so. That correct? I trust you implicitly now, so tell me; is it true that the Pilgrims didn't sail on the 'Mayflower' across the Atlantic from Plymouth at all but on a coal barge called 'Fanny's Folly' up the Leeds-Liverpool Canal from Wigan Pier? Whateverest, chum, I agree with the OP that a clampdown on gunslingers wasn't the worst idea over here since we replaced the Druids with Steeleye Span. I understand the nefarious political advantages of defending or even supporting the right to gun possession and carrying in the US, I just don't catch the morality or common sense in making daily massacre such an easy game to play. N
My dad legally owned a tank, Rhythm. He was a Scots lad but, even so, he told me it was perfectly legal. He was even encouraged to conceal the weapon at times. Mind you, they wouldn't let him keep it and take it home with him after the North Africa campaign against Rommel ended during WWII. N
My dad legally owned a tank, Rhythm. He was a Scots lad but, even so, he told me it was perfectly legal. He was even encouraged to conceal the weapon at times. Mind you, they wouldn't let him keep it and take it home with him after the North Africa campaign against Rommel ended during WWII. N
"There's an irrational explanation for everything." Neil Marr
