RE: Eastwood vs. the empty chair
August 31, 2012 at 1:13 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2012 at 1:14 pm by Reforged.)
(August 31, 2012 at 12:49 pm)A Theist Wrote:I admit Taken was great but he was the main character in that. In The Dead Pool he had a bit part and a rather silly one at that.(August 31, 2012 at 12:40 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: If I remember correctly the grand finale was him chasing the killer in his white vest tucked into his trousers looking like the freshly picked carcass of the worlds largest fried chicken. I bet the killer didn't know whether to shoot him or send him back to his nursing home. It was just awful. Like, ABC movie awful.I didn't say it was one of his best, but it wasn't too awfully bad either. It did have Liam Neeson in the movie who was definitely kickass in 'Taken'.
They were so desperate for ideas they chucked in Jim Carrey as a victim and Jackie Chans overweight brother as a partner.
I died alittle inside when I watched this film. It was like looking into the Ark of the Covenant. Thats how bad it was.
Incase anyone has somehow missed my post on "The Dead Pool" not far above this one it was a true abortion of a movie that had various hardened thugs cowering at the site of an OAP dressed like hes on his way to his daughters violin practise. I know its unlikely but I just wanted to make quite certain I get across the fact that if you did watch this film you would fall into a coma from five months up to ten years after which you would regain consciousnous wide eyed and screaming and then you would succumb to renal failure.
Imagine the tape from the ring only you would actually deserve what happened for watching it.
I will never feel lucky again.
What would you say qualifies as an awful film then?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.