(September 4, 2012 at 9:48 am)stephenmills1000 Wrote: This was not an argument to justify such a being's existence, only the attributes it would necessarily possess to be what was described previously. You may freely treat it hypothetically. Also, if the being was contingent upon something else, then that being would have greater power, and thus be the subject of this discussion.
In that light, would you agree then?
Like I said, no. Merely being the cause of something is no indication of that being's power or knowledge.


