That was the point of the article. Are you confusing the article with the OP? It seems like you are, because the OP mentions the perceived intolerance of secularism quite explicitly.
Here's a link so you can look at it again, to catch what you missed: http://atheistforums.org/thread-14602-po...#pid331493
Here's a link to the article, which is quite different from the OP. It's not the same as the OP: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/educat...mbers.html
If you ask me, I think this touches on the matter of whether secularism is politicized to be liberal in nature. It seems as though it is.
Here's a link so you can look at it again, to catch what you missed: http://atheistforums.org/thread-14602-po...#pid331493
Here's a link to the article, which is quite different from the OP. It's not the same as the OP: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/educat...mbers.html
If you ask me, I think this touches on the matter of whether secularism is politicized to be liberal in nature. It seems as though it is.