RE: So...guess I'm the new guy
September 4, 2012 at 6:55 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2012 at 6:56 pm by Reforged.)
(September 4, 2012 at 6:46 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote:(September 4, 2012 at 6:41 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: The statement that I am an English teacher is an admission that you are in need of one. Its good to see you are coming to terms with your self-evident limitations.
You're saying the two chestnuts would not be physical proof that putting one chestnut with one chestnut will inevitably lead to a very specific and easily predictable amount of chestnuts?
Again, be very clear about this.
Whoa, wait a second, Hoodie McGee!
Putting chestnuts together to get specific and easily predictable amounts of chestnuts is not the same as putting 1+1=2.
Now you're confusing one concept with another. Probably because you don't want to admit that science can't prove mathematical truths. Think about it McGee- why would we need axioms in math if we had science? Because science can't prove math, that's why.
Stick to the concept we're talking about. Don't go off into another direction just because you don't like your ass being handed to ya!
The only thing I changed was putting "one" instead of "1" and "put with" instead of "add".
If I add one chestnut to a pocket already containing one chestnut what is the physical result and could you give it a numerical value?
Are you having some trouble doing this? Would you like help?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.