RE: So...guess I'm the new guy
September 4, 2012 at 7:01 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2012 at 7:09 pm by Reforged.)
(September 4, 2012 at 6:58 pm)discordianpope Wrote: Vinny is right about the chestnuts. You have to already have a grasp of mathematics in order to do mathematical operations, even with physical objects. It doesn't mean that mathematics as a whole can't be confirmed by science mind.
The fact remains we describe two chestnuts as being two chestnuts. The addition of one to another requires us to describe it as such.
Mathematics simply acknowledges this physically evident process using symbols as opposed to descriptive words.
Does it not?
I don't mean to rush you Vince but it really wasn't that much of a difficult question. I know there were some long words thrown in there like "physical" or "numerical" that probably perplexed you because I didn't provide a definition but still... I can't help but feel you should of come to a conclusion by now.
Just sayin'.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
