RE: So...guess I'm the new guy
September 4, 2012 at 8:48 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2012 at 8:50 pm by Vincenzo Vinny G..)
(September 4, 2012 at 7:56 pm)discordianpope Wrote: when you take two chestnuts and describe them as two chestnuts you have already started doing the math though. You have identified a set - a mathematical object - and assigned a cardinality to the set. I think, my maths knowledge in't too good. In the very act of carving up reality into these sets of one things, two things, and tens of things, you are already doing the math though. And then when you add these sets together to get bigger sets of things (like chestnuts) you are doing more maths, whether you use numbers to describe the process or not. All this doesn't mean that science can't confirm mathematics though. Just because we didn't begin with an empirical basis for mathematics doesn't mean we can't use the success of science to say "Gee, I guess those mathematical intuitions must have been right, cos all this physics is basically mathematics and it seems to work pretty well!" That's where Vinny is wrong. I actually, I think he is right about mathematics not being empirically testable, but I wouldn't say that it's all just assumed either.
I'm not saying mathematical truths cannot be confirmed or supported by science. Or more properly, a posteriori knowledge or empirical observation (is science isotropic to empirical observation? I don't think so, but that's another subject).
But so far as "proving numbers and mathematical relations are valid through science", as Hoodie wants to prove, there has to be a hypothesis first. And you cannot make this hypothesis simply by observing the world. Numbers and mathematical relations don't exist in the world in the same way as the objects of scientific inquiry exist.
From this it's almost commonsensical to say that "proving math" lies outside the realm of science, because science, at least hard science, is fundamentally physical, and mathematical quantities and relations are non-physical.
I thought this was fundamental, commonsense knowledge. I can't believe it's being denied that science makes assumptions it cannot prove.