(September 6, 2012 at 2:26 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: I don't see any substance to your claims. If you want me to take your answers seriously, answer the following:
1) What do you think is the strongest response to the Euthyphro dilemma and how do you defeat it?
I usually stick my fingers in my ears and say "lalalalalalalala"
Quote:2) How do atheists define objective within the context of objective moral values?
I can't speak for the unsaved trash but for myself, I'd define the Lord's objective morality as whatever the Lord objectively said at that moment and this code of morality is absolute. For example, if the Lord tells us,
Quote:1Sam 15:2-3
"So go now and attack the Amalekites. Put them under the curse of destruction. Kill the men, women, children, and babies, cattle, sheep, camels, and donkeys. Spare no one."
Then you better kill every man, woman and child in that tribe. Genocide is what is morally correct in this case.
Looking forward to our debate where I will instruct you further on our Lord's moral absolutes.
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church
: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:
: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:
![Wink Wink](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/wink.gif)