RE: So...guess I'm the new guy
September 8, 2012 at 2:59 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2012 at 2:59 pm by Vincenzo Vinny G..)
(September 8, 2012 at 2:55 am)greneknight Wrote: No, there is not just one acceptable answer for me. You can say you're a Hindu or a Muslim or a believer in Aztec human sacrifice and I'm not going to say you can't say that. You said if I asked you, you would reply. Now, instead of answering, you come back with more questions.
Yes, I would like you to state your religion / religious affiliation and there are no limits provided you answer openly and without evading. I would be grateful if your next post is a straightforward, open, honest answer and not more questions.
I don't want to evade the question. But I also don't want to be compelled. It should be my free choice to do so when and how I want to, and I presume you agree with me. So you won't badger me to answer your question. I presume you're interested in having a conversation rather than just finding out what religion or irreligion I claim to be a part of.
But the one thing I am curious about, is why you feel I am obligated to do what you want- after all, I'm struggling to find any reason to do so. You tried to harass me (without knowing my real religion, you tried to guess in order to do so). You tried to compel me to answer your question, disrupting conversations all over the forum and harassing other members of this forum to further your accusations against me. You insulted me.
And all of a sudden, I should just answer your question? I don't understand. How do I know you will not just continue to harass me?
Vinny G.
(September 8, 2012 at 4:31 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Actually I think what he was getting at is more that a answer is an acceptable response to a question regardless of whether it confirmed his hypothesis or not as opposed to the endless stream of evasive bullshit you flooded two pages of this thread with.
Just sayin'.
Hi Raphiel. Aren't you a science-denier? Aren't you one of those kooks who thinks you can use science to prove mathematical proofs?
I'm sorry, but you don't have any credibility in this, or any other discussion as far as I am concerned. You are the Alex Jones of journalism.