So...guess I'm the new guy

[Vincenzo Vinny G.]

Keeping the focus on the topic though. The question was whether mathematics can be proven within science.

Er... no, you were attempting to misrepresent me and it was obvious to anyone capable of reading.

Actually I think your claim was that mathematics is a metaphysical assumption and it demonstrably isn't.
Mathematics has an incredible amount of physical evidence to back-up its validity as a system that yields accurate results.
It cannot be defined either as metaphysical or assumptions. If you disagree buy yourself a dictionary and see if you can troll that.
Thanks for playing.

---

(Totally worth it.)

That's not me. I wear top hats.

But even when you claim "incredible amount of physical evidence", you are implying a second assumption of science. It's the problem of induction. Again.

Yet another scientific assumption.