(September 13, 2012 at 1:26 pm)Undeceived Wrote: Morality is known by an inner sense, conveyed (negatively) by guilt and (positively) by contentment. We can tell the difference between God's morality and evolution's by the mechanisms in place. If morality is linked directly to survival in every phase, it is compatible with evolution. If, however, some completely non-selfish qualities are revealed, we must appeal to a Creator with more than propagation in mind.
Completely and utterly wrong. Evolution doesn't guarantee that every aspect that ever evolved would be geared towards survival. If it did, there would be no diseases. Also, even if that were false, it doesn't make your appeal to creator true by default. Maybe the ultimate moral authority isn't the creator but something else that he created that has surpassed it.
(September 13, 2012 at 1:26 pm)Undeceived Wrote: I don't know if there's a 'morality gene' per se. The human brain remains a mystery to scientists. Everyone has a unique soul not received from parents so it's conceivable morality could also be imparted at conception.
Try asking a fetus its opinions on morality and you'll find out if that is true or not.
(September 13, 2012 at 1:26 pm)Undeceived Wrote: The Bible tells us we are not just physical beings but spiritual persons, half of us at home in the body, half yearning for a spiritual relationship with Jesus Christ.
A bare-faced lie. Full of me is at home in my body and none of me yearns for any sort of relationship with that imaginary being.
(September 13, 2012 at 1:26 pm)Undeceived Wrote: You have to do nothing, only accept Jesus dying for your sins. Be of a repentant heart.
So you do have to do something. And that something is selfish.