(September 20, 2012 at 10:48 am)Drich Wrote:(September 19, 2012 at 11:42 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: To earth, to accomplish what was now supposedly 'finished' in John.
John was a deciple of Christ wouldn't stand to reason that John had more insight than Mark a deciple of Paul? Paul and John were two different men with two different focal points when it came to their minstries. John Taught a slight different view of Christ because he saw Christ and the importanc/focous of His work here as slightly different that Peter/Mark may have.
So the juciest Gospel of them all (and very reliable in your opinion) just happens to have been written after the other 3. Hmm... Genuine account by 'John' or rumours gone wild?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
