(September 21, 2012 at 7:21 pm)Darkstar Wrote:(September 21, 2012 at 1:30 pm)apophenia Wrote: I was being sarcastic. Your thinking in this area appears to lack clarity. I am not a bringer of light.
Okay, I'll try to explain it better. Some people argue over whether morality is objective or subjective. Some say it is subjective because you can decide what is right and wrong. Others say it is objective because saying something is moral does not automatically make it so, even if you, or your entire culture believes it. I say that both explanations have some truth to them. Morality is objective on a situational basis, and subjective in that you must use your own judgement to decide if something is moral or immoral in the given context. It is objective in that there are often right and wrong answers to these situation descisions, although it can be ambiguous at times.
![[Image: will-farrell-Vomit.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=dl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F52566856%2FAFO%2F0001%2Fwill-farrell-Vomit.gif)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)