Proving a negative has got nothing to do what you don't believe. I'm not asking you to prove the non-existence of anything. It's not the negative proof fallacy.
What I'm saying is you contradict yourself because you say his existence doesn't matter, but then you say he makes sense because the bible is inspired through him...
...but the problem is if he doesn't exist then he can't inspire anything!!
So how can you rationally justify his existence not mattering but only the inspiration you get from him, if if he doesn't exist then he can't inspire anything? Because then there is no He to inspire anything!
EvF
What I'm saying is you contradict yourself because you say his existence doesn't matter, but then you say he makes sense because the bible is inspired through him...
...but the problem is if he doesn't exist then he can't inspire anything!!
So how can you rationally justify his existence not mattering but only the inspiration you get from him, if if he doesn't exist then he can't inspire anything? Because then there is no He to inspire anything!
EvF