(September 23, 2012 at 10:54 pm)TaraJo Wrote:(September 23, 2012 at 10:50 pm)Drich Wrote: ...So you want to know why it is illeagal to not involve Children in sex acts? Seriously?
Because at 12 or whatever age you want to push the 'age of consent' back to, a Child does not understand the totality of the desision he/she is being forced to make. Therfore if a Child can not protect him/herself then soceity has an obligation to do that for them by telling people who want to have sex with kids that they will be put in prision far removed from children.
So, Drich, which of these two do you think is better able to consent to a sexual relationship?
1) A 21 year old woman who is mentally retarded and, psychologically, is about the same as a ten year old.
or
2) A 16 or 17 year old who use a fake ID to get into a bar, gets drunk, sleeps with a guy and blackmails him with statutory rape charges if he doesn't buy them lots of expensive gifts.
Can I choose both?
... what?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
