Why is it illegal to be happy?

[Drich]

Yeeeah, was with you up until you equated people not commenting as all being atheist.
Could it be that maybe, just maybe the people who looked at it were guests and therefore not able to comment? Funny, I don't see comments from any other Christians here but you.

I don't know how your AF page presents, but on the top near where the list of threads begin, there is a list of Members who are all in this thread. (None of which were Christian.) Which is why I made the comment.
If they were I would have said something. But any way thier was a handful when I first clicked on this thread.

I mean its great you did comment on it but please don't be so fucking stupid as to make out that people who are atheists are somehow alright with paedophilia.

Pediophilia was not the issue i was pointing out. It is the netural stance that is synomous with atheism in general. Which causes some of you all to pause to see how a 'room' will react before you say anything. I am sure if the conversation when the otherway and there was a few of the more outspoken members who entertained the idea even jokingly, those "Not alright" with pedophillia would have moved on, and been Not alright with it. Again Not to say someone would not have said something because you are all too opionated to not speak out. The point being was I was the 20th person to view this thread with a hand full of 'other' members at hand and the first to say something. The topic (and where any of you stand in relation to said topic) is a secondary concern to the point I was making. Point being 20 of you have sold your selves/your 'morality' to see what other people were going to say first. This is the danger of atheism I was speaking of. That you (at least the 20) felt the need to keep their thoughts to themselves on a topic that just a few years ago would have demanded heads to roll!

Its see-through, pathetic and has lowered my opinion of you even further.
I didn't even know that was possible.

Your trying to make this about something it is not. There were 20 views (24 by the time I posted my 'judgement.') and not one word from anyone. There were at least 5 members present (including the OP Which is the first thing I look for when posting in a new thread, so as to not wander off if their is a quick response.)

---

[quote='TaraJo' pid='340768' dateline='1348458275']
Well, mostly I'm concerned because our sex laws are more about arbitrary ages and less about the psychological/mental maturity of the people involved. If someone is a mature 15 year old, I'd be more willing to trust their choices sexually than an irresponsible/immature 18 year old. Laws should have wiggle room.

...And at 15 who pays for the consenquences of this sex? What happens when the 15 year old get herpies or aids.. Or just has a baby? Your basing a judgement on the mental capasity of a 15year old, and ignoring everything else. a 15 yearold who has a kid is not going to be able to support that kid. That means your kid will be making desisions that will be effecting the whole household. How insane is that? Would you allow a 15 yearold who has maybe a min wage job to buy a 30,000 dollar car and put it in your name? Then why let them spend 30k on all the baby stuff that will be needed?

People Shouldn't have sex until they can completely deal with all of the possiable responsiables of intercourse. (Married)