(September 24, 2012 at 2:07 am)Ciel_Rouge Wrote: Hi CapnAwesome, I am perfectly aware that pedophiles are trying to use the issue of age of consent and its volatility and complexity as a means to "justify" pedophilia. But please try to read my posts carefully. In Post #10 I wrote:
(September 23, 2012 at 11:15 pm)Ciel_Rouge Wrote: I am AGAINST forced sex involving CHILDREN, and in particular I am strongly AGAINST Christian priests doing that.
Is this not clear enough for you?
(September 23, 2012 at 11:15 pm)Ciel_Rouge Wrote: Well, in your limited perspective sex seems to mean penetration. This could obviously cause bodily and mental harm. I am NOT advocating that. In fact, there have been a few scandals involving Christian priests doing just that ;-) I am NOT attracted to 12 year oldsI was 12 MYSELF when I was attracted to a 25 year old teacher.
I used the present tense in my question as means of expressing a general idea and never suggested I was underage myself, I suppose anyone can easily infer from the way I express my thoughts that I am not a "minor"
First off, I think I made clear that I consider ALL sex with children to be forced sex, because children aren't capable of consenting to sex with adults. Although you might very well have wanted to get your bone on with your teacher as a 12 year old, that is not the same as being capable of consent. Desire and consent are not the same. The same as if I have sex with a someone very drunk when I am completely sober.
All you are saying in being against 'forced' sex with children is that you are against child rape. That's hardly independant of what I was saying, that your fourth premise is in favor of pedophilia. Which of course, it is.
