RE: Why Does Atheism and Left-Wing Politics Usually Go Together?
September 30, 2012 at 8:12 am
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2012 at 8:21 am by kılıç_mehmet.)
Communism opposes "nations". The nations that we know today are nations that are there due to similarities and differences between people. Communism seeks to eradicate all similarities and differences between people, and create a single type of human being that is only bent on fulfilling it's most base desires.
This is why communism is hostile to native cultures, traditions and etc. and tries to force people to think same.
In communism, the government does not "pay" for yout shit. In theory, you are just taking what is "yours", as all property belongs to "everyone" and "equal distribution" is theoretically in place, and is governed by the "people", the people, distribute stuff amongst the people.
Say, I want to move to a different city. I immidiately go to an empty house without paying, which has furniture, and basic needs such as water and electricity supplied to it, free of charge.
On the other hand, I leave my old home behind-I cannot take any furniture with me, and someone else goes to live there, after I have left that place.
Obviously, tis' sounds nice, if you actually are pure in your mind and soul, and want to share your property with your kin and brother.
But communism dictates that you should share your property with someone who is not your kin and not your brother, and kinship is not to be taken into consideration no matter what. You cannot leave behind anything for your son to own and look back, this is why the peope in ex-soviet countries are so poor. They cannot accumulate resources.
The views of communism towards "people" is simply to see them as "heaps". Communism views people as a "mass". But this mass does not have to be necessarily motivated by a firm set of ideals, morals and traditions.
My own ideology also puts value on "people", but we believe that without a consciousness, what is a heap and mass of people? Cattle too, live and graze in masses, but they are only fit for slaughter. They too are given equal distribution of materials by their masters.
But they are always nothing more than cattle. If the cattle had the intelligence to unite themselves under a common ideal, a real ideal, they would wield power-even if there was no distribution of resources whatsoever. For that would naturally come with a consciousness, an awakening, the thought of being "kin" and fighting and subduing those who are hostile towards the kin, and are not of the kin.
This is why communism is hostile to native cultures, traditions and etc. and tries to force people to think same.
In communism, the government does not "pay" for yout shit. In theory, you are just taking what is "yours", as all property belongs to "everyone" and "equal distribution" is theoretically in place, and is governed by the "people", the people, distribute stuff amongst the people.
Say, I want to move to a different city. I immidiately go to an empty house without paying, which has furniture, and basic needs such as water and electricity supplied to it, free of charge.
On the other hand, I leave my old home behind-I cannot take any furniture with me, and someone else goes to live there, after I have left that place.
Obviously, tis' sounds nice, if you actually are pure in your mind and soul, and want to share your property with your kin and brother.
But communism dictates that you should share your property with someone who is not your kin and not your brother, and kinship is not to be taken into consideration no matter what. You cannot leave behind anything for your son to own and look back, this is why the peope in ex-soviet countries are so poor. They cannot accumulate resources.
The views of communism towards "people" is simply to see them as "heaps". Communism views people as a "mass". But this mass does not have to be necessarily motivated by a firm set of ideals, morals and traditions.
My own ideology also puts value on "people", but we believe that without a consciousness, what is a heap and mass of people? Cattle too, live and graze in masses, but they are only fit for slaughter. They too are given equal distribution of materials by their masters.
But they are always nothing more than cattle. If the cattle had the intelligence to unite themselves under a common ideal, a real ideal, they would wield power-even if there was no distribution of resources whatsoever. For that would naturally come with a consciousness, an awakening, the thought of being "kin" and fighting and subduing those who are hostile towards the kin, and are not of the kin.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?