Interview

[Drich]

You're missing the point, Drich. You keep saying that we are on 'our high horse' and that we need to arbitrarily dismiss your arguments to make ourselves feel better when it isn't true.

You guys need to stop read posts directed at other people, and assuming that all are being addressed. I directed that comment at something SQ said. (In that no one on this website could ever stoop to such a level as to insult someone else's perceived weakness.)
You have shown yourself (99% of the time) to be a follower of content and directly address the material being discussed over looking the window dressing others need to even read a given post.

Of course, if I point out the obvious fact that you seem to be doing this right now, you will simply accuse me of it. At the end of the day, the person with facts is supported, and the one without is not.

What of the facts i presented? In that I have not made anyone dress me down or insult me. That oppertunity was presented and those looking for that type of oppertunity took it.

If you reject the facts we present, there is nothing we can do. And if you present ambiguous sources as 'solid' evidence, we will dismiss it. Of course, you will then accuse me of being the one to dismiss solid sources and say you have the actual facts.

do you have any examples?

We do; you just refuse to believe us.

The fact of the matter is that at the end of the day science works. Period. You would not be at this forum right now if it weren't for science. If you are willing to disregard something that has been objectively proven to be effective time and time again in favor of speculation and ancient texts of highly questionable accuracy, then what can we do?

somehow i get the feeling you didn't read or didn't follow the whole dialog SQ and I were having. If you did your going to have to explain this to me.