(October 27, 2012 at 7:52 pm)Spectrum Wrote:(October 26, 2012 at 7:37 am)Tiberius Wrote: You don't want Bush on steroids? Have you seen the stuff the Obama administration has done over the past 4 years?
He extended the Patriot act, increased the amount of warrantless spying, signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which permits the government to hold suspects of terrorism indefinitely without trial (even if they are American), and operates a secret kill list.
But that's ok, because at least he closed Guantanamo right? Oh...yeah.
You already got Bush on steroids; he just happened to be a Democrat.
Obama is probably a much better guy than Romney, all things considered. What does it matter though? We already know that Obama is always doing what he can to appease the elite and military, at the expense of responsible economics and the public's rights. Why during the debate, he even agreed with Obama that the corporate tax rate needs to be lowered! Why would you do that, when the corporations are actually fairing pretty well, while everyone is not?
Obama is a lost cause, and Romney is too slimy. If you actually take the effort to go and vote for either of these guys, you're showing politicians that they can get power by simply showing up and making empty promises. You will be lowering the standards as to what constitutes leadership. You will be part of the problem.
It sounds nice, but only in theory, friend. People do not vote in America according to public interests, but self interests.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?