(November 3, 2012 at 8:27 am)Waratah Wrote:I noted a correlation, admittedly took it too far with the 2+2=4 statement, but then agreed with respondents that correlation doesn't prove causation. I never went on to say that causation could be proven in this case. I merely noted that correlation can give an idea to be explored. I've been quite reasonable in the thread.(November 3, 2012 at 8:15 am)John V Wrote: I like how you guys keep trying to shift the burden of proof to me. Support the freaking OP.What a joke you are really. Think about it. YOU make a stupid fucking statement. YOUR statement YOUR proof needed so please start backing up with facts instead of your weak posts. Do you see now NO SHIFT of burden. It really is simple, even for you.
What statement exactly am I supposed to back up with facts?
