(November 4, 2012 at 8:27 am)Insanity x Wrote: Well in that case I am more christian than most christian's I know considering Ive actually read the bible. lol.So your argument is that people are so stupid that they readily behave contrary to their solemn beliefs?
Have you ever bought something new just because you wanted it? You may think its a bad idea but you just can't help yourself. I do it all the time. I believe that I should spend less time on my xbox and more time reading for my course but I still play my xbox as much. It doesnt mean I dont believe I need to read for my course.
(November 4, 2012 at 2:56 pm)Kirbmarc Wrote: Porn actors are usually screened for veneral diseases far more frequently than the general popoulation. And condom are impopular among porn consumers.Incorrect. Or, if you prefer, only a half-truth. They only test for three STI's: Gonorrhea, Chlamydia and HIV link. There is zero protection against other untested STI's. The STI rate among pron stars is substantially higher than the general population:
Chlamydia incidence in adult film performers was 8.5 times higher than the rate in Los Angeles County residents aged 18-29 and 34 times higher than in the general population. Gonorrhea incidence was 18 times higher in porn performers than Los Angeles County residents aged 18-29 and 64 times higher than in the general population.Link.
On your second point - since when do consumers get to decide what risks and hazards reside in the workplace ("manufacturing plant" if you prefer)? If I want to buy a brand new safe packed with asbestos because it produces the best product, does that mean those that make it have to be put at risk because I want asbestos in it? Wouldn't worry me, I'd be at no risk from it being sealed inside the walls of the finished product...
