RE: Who here really believes what they claim to?
November 5, 2012 at 7:22 am
(November 5, 2012 at 6:58 am)Kirbmarc Wrote: The safe example doesn't reallly work: you need a safe for specific use, you don't need to watch the workers producing it. Adult filming is part of the show business: their product is what they show.
No, I don't need to "watch" them, but if I'm going to demand that I want asbestos in it because it produces the best possible product (and believe me it does), then I'm telling them to put everyone's health at risk so I can have a safe that has asbestos in it. They're not going to do that. Asbestos is only used when absolutely necessary (in Australia anyway). The only example I can think of off hand is missiles, but I'm sure they'd be more. The point is that the safemaker will give me an inferior quality product because it can be produced safely. It's a perfect example.
Quote:So, since the public doesn't like condom, producers don't use condoms. You may call the adult movie producers cynical for doing this, but that's just how the industry works. And since the actors accept the risk, there's no need for the state to barge in.
So if the safemakers are willing to accept the risk of breathing in asbestos, the State should stay out of it?
