about what? the hyprocisy of this post? No, the emoticon dipicts what I think fairly accuratly. Otherwise i would have to spend time establishing that this person is Of the westen culture of movies and violence and then would have to listen to him defend why movie/video game violence is ok, but a 1" by1/2" cross worn around the neck of the faithful is offensive. Then i would be inclined to show this persons bigotted response as just another attempt to censor religion. Then I noticed that he is the same d-bag who was upset that their are laws preventing men of his age having sex with tweens, and even younger childern... so no, i do not have anything to add, because it would be a waist of time on this person, because defending this dipiction of love to a man like this would be lost... as is any picture of love that doesnot involve his penis and a small child.
http://atheistforums.org/post-340733.html#pid340733
This ______ wants to Censor freedom of religion, but allow 20 or 30 somethings to have sex with preteens and small children.. we are commanded to not throw our pearls of wisdom before swine. so again no, their is nothing more to say to him. This is the utilmate goal of 'morality.' To justify what one likes and to villify what one is apposed to with absolutly no accountablity or reasoning behind it.
http://atheistforums.org/post-340733.html#pid340733
This ______ wants to Censor freedom of religion, but allow 20 or 30 somethings to have sex with preteens and small children.. we are commanded to not throw our pearls of wisdom before swine. so again no, their is nothing more to say to him. This is the utilmate goal of 'morality.' To justify what one likes and to villify what one is apposed to with absolutly no accountablity or reasoning behind it.
