Ex-Christians

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='Ryantology' pid='361807' dateline='1352744835']

No argument insisting the existence of God is valid until God is conclusively proven to be real. He is fiction until proven otherwise.

Your refusal to accept this does not constitute a victory in debate. Sorry to break your streak. :c

That's obviously false.
The arguments and evidence ARE the demonstration of probable existence (ontological foundations).

Using your sloppy thinking, atoms, subatomic particles, gravity or love could not be proven real. We only know of them by evidence and experience derived from their known effects.

Sorry, but your poor reasoning skills don't defeat anything.

---

I don't think you have been paying attention.

Every argument you have put forward has been tired, old, well refuted looonnnggg ago bollocks.

I think you like to delude yourself that you've won an argument the same way my dad does, by being loud and always saying the last thing.
This has no bearing on whether he is right or not, just that he's louder and more persistent.

Then defeat one of them. You can't. You just claim it.

Ok then one of your most common arguments is the frankly pathetic onotological argument which boils down to "god must exist because he just must".
It tries to use invalid, evidence free reasoning to magic god into existance.

if the greatest possible being exists in the mind, it must also exist in reality. If it only exists in the mind, a greater being is possible—one which exists in the mind and in reality

The argument makes a statement that it fails to back up with anything resembling evidence or even good logic.

It is a massive fail

Well that's one.