RE: Again....But it's never the guns!
December 16, 2012 at 12:44 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2012 at 12:46 pm by Shell B.)
(December 16, 2012 at 12:10 pm)TaraJo Wrote: Strawman? Really? You want to talk about strawmen? Every time the NRA sees stuff like this happen, I always hear from them and their people about how I'm trying to take their guns away, even though I've never said that. Every time the government takes steps towards regulating guns, they always rely on that same strawman. It happened with the brady bill, it happened with trigger locks and it's happened with armor piercing bullets.
Do I look like the fucking NRA?
Quote:Much of your case seems to be that guns aren't any more destructive now than they were three hundred years ago. Tell me, were we to release Charles Manson into the public and give him a weapon, which would you rather he have: a 1799 era musket (with powder, pellets and any other accessories he'd need to use it) or a 2012 era assault rifle?
Wow. I don't think you have any idea how bad your arguments are. Sorry. Charles Manson never killed anyone. Not one fucking person. He shot one person, who did not die. Furthermore, the people he got to kill other people used both guns and knives. Read about it. They didn't need the guns.
Oh, hell, whateverist. Who here is for the status quo? Me? Nope. All I'm arguing are idiotic remarks about the founding fathers. I'm not here to argue gun control. I have already stated numerous times that it needs strict regulation.