(December 18, 2012 at 12:14 am)cato123 Wrote: Try again after considering the deaths/incident rate. Also, to make it relevant, let's consider how many times a car is intentionally used as a weapon to kill others.
It's one in every 300 accidents in the year 2009. Shouldn't we be more concerned that these deaths aren't occurring on purpose? What's more dangerous, guns or distracted driving? The point is: Using the argument that Brian used is not effective nor logical. To ban a thing on death rate alone... We'd do away with cigarettes, booze, cars, peanuts (and other things that people tend to be highly allergic to), ect.
![[Image: SigBarSping_zpscd7e35e1.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i169.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu224%2FUchiha_Kina%2FTags%2FSigBarSping_zpscd7e35e1.png)