I find the word "liberals" in it`s use to be weird within the US.
Oftern used as if it describes a disgusting disease, it categorises a entire political class of people, who actualy hardly ever refer to themselves as "liberals".
From what I saw of the democratic party so far, the range of different opinions within it is very diverse.
It is also used in such a unspecific way, meaning that it never points out a specific person, but always describes a nebolous block of people, of which one should be afraid to be categorised in.
But I guess the use of that word falls into exactly the same category, like Stalin refering to his "enemies" as the "bourgeoisie".
To me it means liberterians, since it`s what most European liberterian parties call themselves.
Oftern used as if it describes a disgusting disease, it categorises a entire political class of people, who actualy hardly ever refer to themselves as "liberals".
From what I saw of the democratic party so far, the range of different opinions within it is very diverse.
It is also used in such a unspecific way, meaning that it never points out a specific person, but always describes a nebolous block of people, of which one should be afraid to be categorised in.
But I guess the use of that word falls into exactly the same category, like Stalin refering to his "enemies" as the "bourgeoisie".
To me it means liberterians, since it`s what most European liberterian parties call themselves.
