Nice to know that even if a theist could offer a convincing proof of a god's existence, they still would not be able to agree on what that god wants of us. Frankly I appreciate having that out in the open. I've been on forums where the theist participants collude to present a unified front and mildly chide each other if either transgresses the terms of their pact.
By the way, a convincing proof of a god's existence would have to begin with an explicit definition of what a god is exactly, something I've never been clear on.
By the way, a convincing proof of a god's existence would have to begin with an explicit definition of what a god is exactly, something I've never been clear on.
