Burden of Proof

[Mark 13:13]

Yeah all this axiom definition bullshit is a distraction. Burden of Proof = make a claim, back it up. Which is sensible.

But that's the point that i'm trying to get to; forget all this burden of proof as before it can be used we need to prove the party that has the burden of proof or have an authority define who is have the burden of proof. I say as you do except instead of using the word axiom I would substitute "burden of proof" and say go on make your point; have your opinion and back it up with whatever you want, and you are free to to use whatever evidence you want and I am free to believe it or not based on the complex processes that I as a human being, evaluate any claim made. But while people keep raising this burden of proof we cant move onto that basis.

---

If it falls on nobody, then what's the use? well can't both parties present their ideas and evidences as they can and let the audience decide what they choose to believe after they have heard all?

Generally, that is how it goes, somebody makes a claim, somebody doesn;t accept the claim, they both give their reasons - and one of those reasons can always be that the person making the claim failed to demonstrate it's veracity......the burden of proof.

True but there is no proof that that,s the only way it can work as I have shown one example already.