(January 7, 2013 at 4:34 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I already provided you with a definition of an axiom in terms of function (which was precisely the same definition in terms of function contained in the wiki I linked to you), and specifically how it didn't apply to "the burden of proof", so no Mark, I didn't.
At this point, I'm going to claim that you already realized this, that you're feigning ignorance - and since you don't seem to put much stock in the burden of proof....I don't even have to elaborate upon that claim. You're just going to have to prove me wrong.
Why do you keep refusing to discuss the quality "without contention" and keep expecting that i will just drop it if you keep ignoring it.
