About the new purple color...
January 7, 2013 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2013 at 5:20 pm by Tea Earl Grey Hot.)
I just wanted to say that the new purple color for donators doesn't make sense to me and I don't like that it makes Lilly's special color less special. The old green made a little more sense because green is the stereotypical color of money but I can see that it was to similar to the color of the mods.
I think color should be associated with the user's permissions (with the exception of Lilly obviously). Donators don't have additional permissions from non-donators correct?
What about donator's names stay blue but have bold text? At least this way you'd have more consistency (associating one color for all members) whilst still making them stand out from us cheapskate members.
Or a darker color blue in addition the bold font?
I think color should be associated with the user's permissions (with the exception of Lilly obviously). Donators don't have additional permissions from non-donators correct?
What about donator's names stay blue but have bold text? At least this way you'd have more consistency (associating one color for all members) whilst still making them stand out from us cheapskate members.
Or a darker color blue in addition the bold font?
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
