That is not the issue. The issue is that NO ONE alive at the alleged time of either made the slightest notation about either one of them.
"Mohammed" supposedly a conqueror who would have been annoying the shit out of both the Byzantine and Parthian empires certainly should have been mentioned by them somewhere even as an annoyance. But they did not mention him.
Even a fantastic rumor of a crucified criminal coming back to life would have been BIG FUCKING NEWS in the Roman empire. It would have been seen as a repudiation of the Romans by the gods. Yet we listen and hear only silence from the people alive at the time. They never heard of the fucker.
"Mohammed" supposedly a conqueror who would have been annoying the shit out of both the Byzantine and Parthian empires certainly should have been mentioned by them somewhere even as an annoyance. But they did not mention him.
Even a fantastic rumor of a crucified criminal coming back to life would have been BIG FUCKING NEWS in the Roman empire. It would have been seen as a repudiation of the Romans by the gods. Yet we listen and hear only silence from the people alive at the time. They never heard of the fucker.
