(January 7, 2013 at 9:38 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: or it could be that i rely on their inteligence to be able to distill what i'm saying and decide for themselves from what i'm saying whats bull shit and whats not.
Umm... And in doing so, would that person not have to decide whether or not you have met your burden of proof? Would that not be the entire point of such a distillation process? They'd be using their intelligence to ascertain whether or not you have provided enough proof for your claim to be considered bullshit or not?
See, you're arguing that it's a separate thing, but mechanically your new system still relies on the burden of proof.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
