
Now Mr Giwer, how about you don't link to your homepage with your first post, and worse, cut and paste its entire contents here? Do you expect us to go and read all that horseshit? How about you go here:
http://blog.aractus.com/
And read all the pages, fuck I'll cut and paste it here for you?
Ah no, I don't think so.
"The Septuagint is the original Old Testament" REALLY??

I find it comical that anyone, except perhaps eastern orthodox loonies, would believe such bullshit. There isn't even one single complete LXX manuscript you douchebag, which by the way you can learn here:
http://blog.aractus.com/search-for-the-septuagint/
"The Septuagint" is nothing more than the fifth column of the Hexapla, thus you cannot date it earlier than 245 AD HA! Oh and since the book of Daniel is only found in Codex Chisianus (although I should point out another copy has supposedly been found that I don't know anything about), that means you don't have a complete copy older than the 9th century of it.
Let me guess "waawaawaawaa"?
Go find some real evidence, and peddle this easily refutable bullshit elsewhere!