That chart might support your point better if it didn't clearly show that the last 16 years averaged warmer than the previous 16 years. I'm not a fan of AGW, but I've been forced to accept that it has correctly identified a trend and most likely correctly identified a major cause of it. All scientific claims, especially of this import, should be treated skeptically. Skepticism doesn't mean 'don't accept as true, no matter what'. No one will be more pleased than me to find that GW isn't happening, but we've reached a point where it's the claims that it isn't real that have to be looked at skeptically. You can make a graph say almost anything if you get to pick the beginning and end points.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 7, 2025, 4:48 pm
Thread Rating:
Bad Science Almost Imposing Restrictive Laws
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
truth about game theory, bad or good for the world? | Quill01 | 13 | 2836 |
August 21, 2021 at 7:25 pm Last Post: vulcanlogician |
|
Damn! How bad did they want to burn up Ted Bundy ? | vorlon13 | 2 | 1154 |
December 12, 2016 at 1:48 am Last Post: vorlon13 |
|
Why combating bad claims is important. | Brian37 | 9 | 2667 |
November 24, 2015 at 11:33 am Last Post: Brian37 |
Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)